VulnGraph vs Wiz

Cloud-infrastructure attack paths, meet application-code attack paths.

Wiz is the leading CNAPP: it graphs attack paths across your cloud infrastructure — misconfigurations, IAM, network exposure, and vulnerable workloads — agentlessly and at scale. VulnGraph builds an attack-path graph too, but at the application layer: how untrusted input flows through your service code, queues and shared databases to a sink. Both reason in paths; they just watch different layers. Together they cover infrastructure and application.

CapabilityVulnGraphWiz
Cloud posture (CSPM) & misconfigurationWiz's core strength.
Cloud infra attack-path graph (IAM, network, exposure)
Agentless cloud workload / vuln scanning
Application-layer cross-service dataflow / taint
Cross-repository code architecture graph
Source-code input→sink path evidence~
SARIF / GitHub Code Scanning output~

✓ full · ~ partial · — not offered

When Wiz fits

Choose Wiz when the risk is in your cloud estate — misconfigured resources, over-permissive IAM, public exposure, and vulnerable hosts mapped into infrastructure attack paths.

When VulnGraph fits

Choose VulnGraph when the risk is in your application — untrusted input crossing service and repository boundaries to a sensitive sink, which infrastructure-layer scanning doesn't trace through code.

Using them together

Run both for full coverage: Wiz for the cloud-infrastructure attack surface, VulnGraph for the application-code attack surface. The infra graph and the code graph answer different halves of "how could an attacker reach our data?"

Other comparisons